Stephen Bax in his article " CALL—past,
present and future" ,divided the progress of CALL into three parts in
order to answer the questions. In part one " where has CALL been?",at
this part he talked about the past of CALL and the three phases of CALL , the
first, Behaviouristic CALL, is perhaps the most plausible and would attract
most agreement. But the other two 'communicative "and "integrative"
categories are far less satisfactory .
In the second part " where is CALL now?",he talked about the role for
CALL at the present time and how it looks like nowadays. In the third and final
Part " where is CALL going? Integrated CALL and normalization" ,he
argued that ,"Our aim should be to attain a state of `normalisation' in
which the technology is invisible and truly integrated". In this he have
the future view that we can come at a level of using technology as a part of
our life and we cannot recognized it like a pen or anything else in our daily
life. He suggests three ways to achieve normalisation
which (a) we must identify the criteria factors, (b)we must review the practice
of each teaching context and (c) we must encourage the normalisation by
adjusting the existing practices .Also he suggests stages of normalisation in
CALL: Early Adopters ,Ignorance/skepticism ,try once, Try again, ,Fear ,normalising
,and normalisation.
Normalisation
in our Saudi context is possible because KSA is developing very fast , you can
see the difference between nowadays and before five years ,you will recognizes
the big difference between them in the field of using technology. I think these
days are the best time to change our minds also to change our believing in
technology to reach Bax’s Normilasation .I
will suggest some ways to achieve it:
-They should give teachers some courses on how to use technology in class
rooms.
-They should reinforce schools with technology
devices.
-Also they can give students courses on how to
deal with technology.